<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for West Oakville Family of Schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wofos.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Parent and School Community Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Halton Music Showcase &#8211; Tue 7 Apr 09 by Brian Morris</title>
		<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/halton-music-showcase-tue-7-apr-09/#comment-3181</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wofos.wordpress.com/?p=604#comment-3181</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to be in this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to be in this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Parent Involvement Event Update by sandrar</title>
		<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/parent-involvement-event-update/#comment-3157</link>
		<dc:creator>sandrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wofos.wordpress.com/?p=176#comment-3157</guid>
		<description>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog.  :) Cheers! Sandra. R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post&#8230; nice! I love your blog.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers! Sandra. R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ward 4 Boundary Decision Deferred by John Hickey</title>
		<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/decision-re-ward-4-boundary-study-deferred/#comment-3145</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wofos.wordpress.com/?p=511#comment-3145</guid>
		<description>For the record, Pilgrim Wood Public School, School Council, on November 4, 2008, requested that HDSB provide Halton specific research data using empirical information such as EQAO results, to show differences in academic outcomes between the single track and dual track delivery model.

The response from the board was 
a) that this request was not part of the pubilc consultation process

b) that the French Immersion Study was completed, and hence this research could not added to its mandate

It is regrettable that the board has waited to the last minute to provide this information. 

If you want to check the accuracy of my statements, please review HSDB&#039;s web-site Questions &amp; Answers section.  I can provide a copy of our council letter, date November 4, to Director Joudrie and all trustee, should you like additional verification.

John Hickey
Co-chair, Pilgrim Wood Public School, School Council</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, Pilgrim Wood Public School, School Council, on November 4, 2008, requested that HDSB provide Halton specific research data using empirical information such as EQAO results, to show differences in academic outcomes between the single track and dual track delivery model.</p>
<p>The response from the board was<br />
a) that this request was not part of the pubilc consultation process</p>
<p>b) that the French Immersion Study was completed, and hence this research could not added to its mandate</p>
<p>It is regrettable that the board has waited to the last minute to provide this information. </p>
<p>If you want to check the accuracy of my statements, please review HSDB&#8217;s web-site Questions &amp; Answers section.  I can provide a copy of our council letter, date November 4, to Director Joudrie and all trustee, should you like additional verification.</p>
<p>John Hickey<br />
Co-chair, Pilgrim Wood Public School, School Council</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ward 4 Boundary Decision Deferred by Katherine</title>
		<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/decision-re-ward-4-boundary-study-deferred/#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wofos.wordpress.com/?p=511#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>Just read the report issued this AM.  I&#039;m VERY concerned that a review of Single Track versus Dual Track is being undertaken with a report completion time of the end of Feb.  It is now Feb 17.  HOW can a complete, accurate and comprehensive report on the different delivery models be completed in two weeks?!  The results of this report will affect possibly thousands of students and the Trustees will vote on long-term FI decisions based on these results.  I don&#039;t think Mr. Joudrie understands how accuarate this report should be and the implications it will have, or he would not recommend that it be finished by the end of the month.  It is incomprehensible that he suggests a review be completed in this time.  This overcrowding issue has been going on for  OVER A YEAR,and they wait until the last 2 weeks to do a report?!!!  It&#039;s just wrong, and I&quot;m mad (as you can tell).  Please let me know what I can do to voice my concerns by tomorrow night so that we don&#039;t, yet again, rush in and make knee-jerk decisions to our education system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read the report issued this AM.  I&#8217;m VERY concerned that a review of Single Track versus Dual Track is being undertaken with a report completion time of the end of Feb.  It is now Feb 17.  HOW can a complete, accurate and comprehensive report on the different delivery models be completed in two weeks?!  The results of this report will affect possibly thousands of students and the Trustees will vote on long-term FI decisions based on these results.  I don&#8217;t think Mr. Joudrie understands how accuarate this report should be and the implications it will have, or he would not recommend that it be finished by the end of the month.  It is incomprehensible that he suggests a review be completed in this time.  This overcrowding issue has been going on for  OVER A YEAR,and they wait until the last 2 weeks to do a report?!!!  It&#8217;s just wrong, and I&#8221;m mad (as you can tell).  Please let me know what I can do to voice my concerns by tomorrow night so that we don&#8217;t, yet again, rush in and make knee-jerk decisions to our education system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Report: LTAP &#8211; Lakeshore Woods by Sandra Hauck</title>
		<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/board-agenda-wed-21-jan-2009/#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Hauck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wofos.wordpress.com/?p=493#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>Could you update us regarding last night&#039;s Board meeting and the LW school?
Thanks,
Sandra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you update us regarding last night&#8217;s Board meeting and the LW school?<br />
Thanks,<br />
Sandra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Report: LTAP &#8211; Lakeshore Woods by Don Vrooman</title>
		<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/board-agenda-wed-21-jan-2009/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Vrooman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wofos.wordpress.com/?p=493#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>Yes, the Beaver article is a reasonable parroting of snippits of the staff report and the discussion at the board meeting.   However, I have no expectaion that the Lakeshore Woods school site will be disposed of as whimsically as it implies.

There are a number of options for Southwest Oakville as a whole over the next five to ten years.  As you may be aware, the mature areas of our Town are suffering from declining enrolment.   Of the 12 public elementary schools built in Wards 1&amp;2 in the 50s and 60s, six remain.  The others were closed in the 70s and 80s after the Boomers headed off to college and the workplace.

The decline continues at a pace that was about 40 kids a year between 2003 and 20066, and this pace is likely to accelerate (in spite of all day every day kindergarten) as more of the &quot;affordable&quot; starter homes in the mature areas are sold as tear-downs to flippers and speculators.

The Beaver fails to report just how inevitable a PARC (program and accommodation review) is for Wards 1&amp;2, regardless of whether a school is built in Lakeshore Woods or not.  

Finally, unless the Provincial Liberals are forthcoming with some significant funding to bring our 50 year old schools up to current standards, we as a community will want to keep our options open with regard to a new school.  Recent announcements suggest that &quot;renewal&quot; is one area where boards can expect to see the purse strings tightened during the economic crisis.

Many things could happen this Wednesday.  It is most likely, however, that the report will be referred or rescheduled to the Program &amp; Accommodation committee.  But one never knows.

Thanks Sandra.

PS. Trustees meet every Wedbesday of the month.  The first and third Wednesdays are Board Meetings at which public delegations and questions are welcome.  Delegations must be requested by the Wednesday prior to the Board Meeting and submitted in written to the Director&#039;s Office by 4:00 PM on the Thuirsday prior to the Board Meeting.  For more information, Gail Gortmaker in the Director&#039;s Office will be very helpful (905-335-3663).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Beaver article is a reasonable parroting of snippits of the staff report and the discussion at the board meeting.   However, I have no expectaion that the Lakeshore Woods school site will be disposed of as whimsically as it implies.</p>
<p>There are a number of options for Southwest Oakville as a whole over the next five to ten years.  As you may be aware, the mature areas of our Town are suffering from declining enrolment.   Of the 12 public elementary schools built in Wards 1&amp;2 in the 50s and 60s, six remain.  The others were closed in the 70s and 80s after the Boomers headed off to college and the workplace.</p>
<p>The decline continues at a pace that was about 40 kids a year between 2003 and 20066, and this pace is likely to accelerate (in spite of all day every day kindergarten) as more of the &#8220;affordable&#8221; starter homes in the mature areas are sold as tear-downs to flippers and speculators.</p>
<p>The Beaver fails to report just how inevitable a PARC (program and accommodation review) is for Wards 1&amp;2, regardless of whether a school is built in Lakeshore Woods or not.  </p>
<p>Finally, unless the Provincial Liberals are forthcoming with some significant funding to bring our 50 year old schools up to current standards, we as a community will want to keep our options open with regard to a new school.  Recent announcements suggest that &#8220;renewal&#8221; is one area where boards can expect to see the purse strings tightened during the economic crisis.</p>
<p>Many things could happen this Wednesday.  It is most likely, however, that the report will be referred or rescheduled to the Program &amp; Accommodation committee.  But one never knows.</p>
<p>Thanks Sandra.</p>
<p>PS. Trustees meet every Wedbesday of the month.  The first and third Wednesdays are Board Meetings at which public delegations and questions are welcome.  Delegations must be requested by the Wednesday prior to the Board Meeting and submitted in written to the Director&#8217;s Office by 4:00 PM on the Thuirsday prior to the Board Meeting.  For more information, Gail Gortmaker in the Director&#8217;s Office will be very helpful (905-335-3663).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Report: LTAP &#8211; Lakeshore Woods by Sandra Hauck</title>
		<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/board-agenda-wed-21-jan-2009/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Hauck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wofos.wordpress.com/?p=493#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>Did you read the article in yesterday&#039;s Oakville Beaver regarding the new school in Lakeshore Woods?  Is it possible as the reporter states that  the Board could &quot;close the door&quot; on a new school at this wednesday&#039;s  board meeting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you read the article in yesterday&#8217;s Oakville Beaver regarding the new school in Lakeshore Woods?  Is it possible as the reporter states that  the Board could &#8220;close the door&#8221; on a new school at this wednesday&#8217;s  board meeting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Report: LTAP &#8211; Lakeshore Woods by Don Vrooman</title>
		<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/board-agenda-wed-21-jan-2009/#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Vrooman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wofos.wordpress.com/?p=493#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>Lots of clarification needed:

  1) There was no motion, Report 09004 contained a recommendation which the Board received for information.
  
  2) The report and its recommendation will be discussed in committee (public) in February before returning to the table for consideration.
  
  3) No action will be taken before February 18 2009. 
  
  4) The report outlines reasons for recommending the release of the site.
  
  5) The report also outlines alternatives to releasing the site, including a PARC (Program and Accommodation Review Committee) for Southwest Oakville.  
 
It is my belief that Southwest Oakville (Wards 1 &amp; 2) will likely undergo a PARC in the next three to seven years, whether we buy the LSW site or release it.  

As in many mature neighbourhoods, Southwest Oakville school enrolments are in decline.  This decline is exacerbated by the tide of stone edifices sweeping aside the &quot;affordable&quot; little bungalows and sidesplits that lured many young families to our area.

The economic downturn will have an impact on capital projects (delays, slowdowns).

Economic downturn aside, all the rules for accommodating students in Ontario could change in the fall of 2010 with the next Provincial election.

I&#039;ll leave it at that for now.  Thanks for your question!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of clarification needed:</p>
<p>  1) There was no motion, Report 09004 contained a recommendation which the Board received for information.</p>
<p>  2) The report and its recommendation will be discussed in committee (public) in February before returning to the table for consideration.</p>
<p>  3) No action will be taken before February 18 2009. </p>
<p>  4) The report outlines reasons for recommending the release of the site.</p>
<p>  5) The report also outlines alternatives to releasing the site, including a PARC (Program and Accommodation Review Committee) for Southwest Oakville.  </p>
<p>It is my belief that Southwest Oakville (Wards 1 &amp; 2) will likely undergo a PARC in the next three to seven years, whether we buy the LSW site or release it.  </p>
<p>As in many mature neighbourhoods, Southwest Oakville school enrolments are in decline.  This decline is exacerbated by the tide of stone edifices sweeping aside the &#8220;affordable&#8221; little bungalows and sidesplits that lured many young families to our area.</p>
<p>The economic downturn will have an impact on capital projects (delays, slowdowns).</p>
<p>Economic downturn aside, all the rules for accommodating students in Ontario could change in the fall of 2010 with the next Provincial election.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave it at that for now.  Thanks for your question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Report: LTAP &#8211; Lakeshore Woods by Jeff Armitage</title>
		<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/board-agenda-wed-21-jan-2009/#comment-3131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Armitage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wofos.wordpress.com/?p=493#comment-3131</guid>
		<description>What was the outcome of this motion?  Was it approved?  Is the plan to return the property to the developers?  Thanks for any insight you can provide.
JA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the outcome of this motion?  Was it approved?  Is the plan to return the property to the developers?  Thanks for any insight you can provide.<br />
JA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lakeshore Woods Public School Site by Jocelyn Lubert</title>
		<link>http://wofos.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/lakeshore-woods-public-school-site/#comment-3128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jocelyn Lubert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wofos.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-3128</guid>
		<description>It is a real shame that the Halton Distirct School board has not done any further research into the dempgraphics of the Lakeshore Woods community.  They may have information on the kids who are currently enrolled in school however has any survery been done on the future number of students who will be flooding the school board in the next 2-5 years.  This community is filled with very young families.

For a town that should be trying to create wonderful communities, I am dissappointed to say the least in what is going on with this Lakeshore Woods property!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a real shame that the Halton Distirct School board has not done any further research into the dempgraphics of the Lakeshore Woods community.  They may have information on the kids who are currently enrolled in school however has any survery been done on the future number of students who will be flooding the school board in the next 2-5 years.  This community is filled with very young families.</p>
<p>For a town that should be trying to create wonderful communities, I am dissappointed to say the least in what is going on with this Lakeshore Woods property!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
